What she said

Camille Paglia on college education, core curriculum, job creation, and mental health:

Vanishing of jobs will plague the rest of this decade and more. Meaningful employment is no longer guaranteed to dutiful, studious members of the middle class in the Western world. College education, which was hugely expanded after World War II and sold as a basic right, is doing a poor job of preparing young people for life outside of a narrow band of the professional class.

Yes, an elite education at stratospheric prices will smooth the way into law or medical school and supply a network of useful future contacts. But what if a student wants a different, less remunerative or status-oriented but more personally fulfilling career? There is little flexibility in American higher education to allow for alternative career tracks.

Jobs, and the preparation of students for them, should be front and center in the thinking of educators. The idea that college is a contemplative realm of humanistic inquiry, removed from vulgar material needs, is nonsense. The humanities have been gutted by four decades of pretentious postmodernist theory and insular identity politics. They bear little relationship to the liberal arts of broad perspective and profound erudition that I was lucky enough to experience in college in the 1960s.

Having taught in art schools for most of my four decades in the classroom, I am used to having students who work with their hands—ceramicists, weavers, woodworkers, metal smiths, jazz drummers. There is a calm, centered, Zen-like engagement with the physical world in their lives. In contrast, I see glib, cynical, neurotic elite-school graduates roiling everywhere in journalism and the media. They have been ill-served by their trendy, word-centered educations.

Jobs, jobs, jobs: We need a sweeping revalorization of the trades. The pressuring of middle-class young people into officebound, paper-pushing jobs is cruelly shortsighted. Concrete manual skills, once gained through the master-apprentice alliance in guilds, build a secure identity. Our present educational system defers credentialing and maturity for too long. When middle-class graduates in their mid-20s are just stepping on the bottom rung of the professional career ladder, many of their working-class peers are already self-supporting and married with young children.

The elite schools, predicated on molding students into mirror images of their professors, seem divorced from any rational consideration of human happiness. In a period of global economic turmoil, with manufacturing jobs migrating overseas and service-sector jobs diminishing in availability and prestige, educators whose salaries are paid by hopeful parents have an obligation to think in practical terms about the destinies of their charges. That may mean a radical stripping down of course offerings, with all teachers responsible for a core curriculum. But every four-year college or university should forge a reciprocal relationship with regional trade schools.

The trades get a bad rap in our culture–and they really shouldn’t. As we press for the college degree as the one-size-fits-all index of job preparedness and global competitiveness (we are led in this by our commander in chief), we dumb that degree down and make it worth less and less. Meanwhile, there are many smart, talented people who are not at home in an academic setting, but can absolutely soar working with their hands, and doing the creative problem-solving and loving craftsmanship that comes with that.

As many of you know, I taught at a boarding school a few years ago. Academically, this school was doing so much that was wrong. But one thing it got really, really right: thanks to a thriving arts program and a twice-weekly “work program,” every kid in the school had the chance to throw pots, paint, sculpt, chop and shift wood, stoke the wood stoves that heated all the buildings, garden, cook, and so on. Kids who got really interested in one thing or another could acquire carpentry skills, or learn to weld, or similar.

The thing about being a plumber or an electrician is your job isn’t going to get exported. And you can see the work you do, and measure its value. An awful lot of people graduate from college–or grad school–with only an ability to manipulate words. And often their abilities in that regard aren’t all that great. That’s dangerously ungrounded stuff — economically unsound, and, for many, personally unsatisfying. We need to expand our definition of what constitutes a respectable career path, and what counts as viable training for the workplace.

  • Share/Bookmark

9 Comments

  1. Eveningsun says:

    College education…is doing a poor job of preparing young people for life outside of a narrow band of the professional class.

    There is little flexibility in American higher education to allow for alternative career tracks.

    I guess such statements make sense to those who don’t consider “college education” and “American higher education” to include community college.

    Paglia is such a snob.

  2. Peter Shoemaekr says:

    I have a question and a thought:

    The question: Obviously the job market is bad right now. But is there empirical evidence that there is a glut of knowledge workers (or whatever you want to call them) and a lack of plumbers and electricians? Just wondering.

    The thought: Paglia’s analysis is somewhat handicapped by her nostalgia for the good ole days of “profound erudition” in the 1960’s. She is entitled to her preferences, but there’s more than a hint of smugness in her celebration of the great education that she received, but you just can’t get anymore.

    That being said, I’m sympathetic to the rehabilitation of the trades, and for the reasons Erin enumerates. Her comment that “you can see the work you do, and measure its value” reminded me of a famous German political economist. What was his name again?

  3. J. Fisher says:

    Having taught in art schools for most of my four decades in the classroom, I am used to having students who work with their hands

    I regret that I have to say something rather arseholeish, but those of us “in the humanities,” not to mention those office “paper-pushers,” do quite a bit of work with our hands–typing, to cite just one example. I’m not saying that I disagree with the intent of this piece. I just find the language–the divide between the snobbish academics and the worldly dirty-handed people in the trades–to be really outdated. It’s also a bit condescending–in both directions. A sweeping “revalorization” of the trades would surely involve rethinking precisely what constitutes a trade. Dirty hands might not always be a requirement.

  4. Erin O'Connor says:

    Matthew Crawford’s Shop Class as Soul Craft is relevant to this discussion. Crawford got his PhD in political philosophy at Chicago, got work in a think tank, and was deeply dissatisfied. Everything changed when he opened a motorcycle repair shop. Reviewed here.

  5. Eveningsun says:

    @ J. Fisher: Excellent point. And there’s another problem with Paglia’s division between those who work with their hands and those who don’t, namely that it obscures the differences between the typically bourgeois artiste (ceramicist, weaver) and the proletarian plumber, both of whom work with their hands. Forgive my crude language, which itself misrepresents the complexity of contemporary socioeconomic reality; I’m using it merely to point up the way Paglia’s schema obscures that reality. Bennington, trade school–what’s the diff?

    And FWIW, my plumber does not have “a calm, centered, Zen-like engagement with the physical world,” at least not when he’s beneath my sink cursing up a storm.

  6. Eveningsun says:

    @ Peter and Erin: The review of Shop Class as Soul Craft makes the book sound like a Marxist-critique-of-alienated-labor lite, so score one for Peter. SCSC author Matthew Crawford is certainly right to remind us of the ways knowledge-work is being Taylorized and proletarianized. I see that every time I battle our distance-ed division over their plans to re-make every distance-ed course in the exact same WebCT format, and every time I try, and fail, to get money for a FT instructorship for one of our hard-working adjuncts.

    But I think the reviewer is pretty naive to say that “all freedom takes is a little willingness to get your hands greasy.” Might prove a little tougher than that.

  7. Erin O'Connor says:

    “Score one for Peter”? Please. I would hope what we’re doing here is something a little more meaningful than trying to score points off one another.

  8. Eveningsun says:

    Fair enough. Score one for Eri…. oh, wait.

Leave a Reply